The Junior Administration

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Has anyone else noticed that both President-Elect Obama and Vice President-Elect Biden are named after their fathers?

According to change.gov, the website for the Office of the President-Elect, Barack Obama's father was "Barack Obama, Sr.", although no reference is made on the site for President-Elect Obama being "Barack Obama, Jr." despite their names, including middle, being the same. Joe Biden's biography on the site lists him as "Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr.", obviously the son of Joe Biden, Sr.

Our current president and vice president are also both named after their fathers, except both President Bush and Vice President Cheney have different middle names than their fathers'.

Anyone else think it just a bit random?

Book Review: The Truth About You

| 1 Comment | No TrackBacks

I recently read The Truth About You: Your Secret to Success by Marcus Buckingham and found the book interesting. The book comes in three pieces: a ~30-minute DVD, an actual book and a notepad, stylized as a "ReMemo" pad.

Truly, I cannot decide if I liked the DVD (which the book asks you watch before reading) or not. I have a personal preconceived notion that a charismatic guy talking about self-discovery is faking it. Mr. Buckingham seems very genuine, but for me, I had to work hard to actually listen to him. In reality, the DVD has some great basic "truths" about life--nothing groundbreaking or worthy of a call to mother to tell her you've discovered the newest nugget required for life.

The book is an "interactive book", which I wasn't sure what that meant when I started reading it. I expected the book and the DVD to work in tandem with each other, to be weaved into use more. After watching the DVD before reading the book, the DVD is referenced but not used again. An interactive book, in this case, means the book, while mostly text to read, does include various prompts with space for you to write a response.

My biggest critique is that the book seems to just repeat what the DVD already said. Sure, there's a bit more depth and reading it gives you a chance to think about it in a different way, but I had the urge to skip paragraphs because of the "I've already heard this from him" line of thought.

That being said, I think the book still has a great market--groups. While individually, I think the book was good--not great--as a self-discovery tool, the book has great potential to be used as part of a group to help individual members discover more about their strengths and weaknesses. Whether you're a corporation, a prayer group or whatever else, using this DVD/book/notepad set as a guided practice to help individuals discover and discuss the results would be quite fruitful. As an individual, I wanted to "skip ahead to the good stuff", but the good stuff about this book is what my mind naturally wanted me to skip. In a group setting, I would have been "called out" early for this and been able to more deeply enjoy the book's strengths.

In short, if you're really yearning to discover more about your strengths or weaknesses, give this book a try. If you feel alright about what you already know, find a group of folks who are like-minded or are yearning and experience this book together.

After the jump, you can explore the first few pages of the book.

Disclaimer: I was given this book by the publisher, Thomas Nelson, as part of a program for book reviewers, but given no direction to follow nor compensation for this review.

Do you tithe?

| 2 Comments | No TrackBacks


I was directed toward a review of a book, Passing the Plate: Why American Christians Don't Give Away More Money. The review mentions has poorly American Christians donate. Some of the numbers:

If just the "committed Christians" (defined as those who attend church at least a few times a month or profess to be "strong" or "very strong" Christians) would tithe, there would be an extra 46 billion dollars a year available for kingdom work. To make that figure more concrete, the authors suggest dozens of different things that $46 billion would fund each year: for example, 150,000 new indigenous missionaries; 50,000 additional theological students in the developing world; 5 million more micro loans to poor entrepreneurs; the food, clothing and shelter for all 6,500,000 current refugees in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East; all the money for a global campaign to prevent and treat malaria; resources to sponsor 20 million needy children worldwide. Their conclusion is surely right: "Reasonably generous financial giving of ordinary American Christians would generate staggering amounts of money that could literally change the world."

Chapter 2 outlines the dismal reality of what American Christians actually give. Twenty percent of American Christians (19 percent of Protestants; 28 percent of Catholics) give nothing to the church. Among Protestants, 10 percent of evangelicals, 28 percent of mainline folk, 33 percent of fundamentalists, and 40 percent of liberal Protestants give nothing. The vast majority of American Christians give very little--the mean average is 2.9 percent. Only 12 percent of Protestants and 4 percent of Catholics tithe.

A small minority of American Christians give most of the total donated. Twenty percent of all Christians give 86.4 percent of the total. The most generous five percent give well over half (59.6 percent) of all contributions. But higher-income American Christians give less as a percentage of household income than poorer American Christians. In the course of the 20th century, as our personal disposable income quadrupled, the percentage donated by American Christians actually declined.

Wow.

What exactly does it mean to tithe? While I haven't read this latest book for their definition, typically, "to tithe" means to give 10% of your income. We most commonly see "tithing" in the context of the Old Testament in various forms. As Christians, we are not subject to the law strictly, but as we believe that all we have belongs to God, we are bound to contribute back toward the greater good. In some circles, 10% is considered the ideal, in others the baseline for giving back.

My wife and I decided to literally tithe, giving 10% of our pre-tax income away.

Where to give? Do give it all to the church? No. Canon 222 states that as faithful, we have two particular financial obligations: to support the Church and to support the poor. We have discerned that means roughly 5% should go to the Church and 5% should go elsewhere.

Since "the Church" is both the local parish and the local diocese (through their annual appeal), we have decided to give 4% to our parish and 1% to the diocese. The remaining 5% is split among a number of organizations including our parish's monthly second collection for charity, Meals on Wheels, Casa Juan Diego. We deviate from the 5% for church and 5% for others as we give to a religious order and to the Peter's Pence out of the 5% for others.

For us, 10% is a sacrifice. Before getting married, I gave what I thought was a fair amount to the parish through our parish's monthly automatic giving program. When we sat down with a calculator and our paystubs, I was shocked how little I was actually giving. After adjusting to consider only my income, I only gave less than 1% of my income to church and a much lower amount to other charities.

Years down the road, we may be blessed with the financial capacity that 10% is no longer a sacrifice. If that day ever comes, I pray that we'll realize our blessings and give even more back toward the greater good.

Whether or not you can donate 10% of your income isn't the point. Are you purposeful in your giving? Do you actually pray and ask God to help guide you in your donation decisions? Do you give your first fruits (i.e. give to others when your paycheck arrives, or do you wait to see what's left before the next payday)? If you're married, have you had a conversation about what causes you think are important and worthy of your donations? Have you discussed why you think they're important?

Tip of the hat to The Deacon's Bench for bringing this book to my attention.

Updated 11/11/08

Democrats for Life

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
A few minutes ago, I finished and submitted my own Open Letter to President-Elect Barack Obama. In the letter, for me, a first. I admitted that I am energized by the Democratic Party.

Before now, I have walked the "moderate" line, since, well, that's what I am. I lean left on economic, foreign, national security, immigration, et al., issues, but I disagree with the pro-choice focus of the Democratic Party. (Additionally, I disagree on the current redefining of marriage, but there are various aspects of the issue that I think are interesting/important/discussion-worthy that have not been discussed. More sometime in the future).

I confessed that while I want to be a Democrat, I cannot, in good conscience, be aligned to a body so much in support of one of the few simply evil things that still commonly exist in this world.

After sending the letter, I found the Democrats for Life group. Does anyone know much about them? They're promoting their "95-10 Initiative", which aims to reduce the number of abortions by 95% in the next ten years by such measures as having more Federal support for women who want to carry their baby to term.

On their site, they mention that abstaining from sex is the only surefire way to prevent an unwanted pregancy, but admit that we can't ignore the risky behavior that exist in our society. They do not support any particular bills related to preventing pregnancies, but frankly, in a religious era where most faiths, no matter their stance on abortion, find little wrong with contraception, I understand that I can tackle this issue later.

I have to run to a First Friday adoration shift that I signed up for, but really, does anyone know anything about the Democrats for Life?
Last night, I attended my first actual Knights of Columbus meeting, transferred and was formally accepted into Council 10131 at St. Ignatius Parish in Austin.

I say first actual because I went to a couple of meetings when the UT council attempted to revive themselves, but by no means were those meetings formalized. The experience reminded much of Lambdas before I was involved in leadership. The guys obviously cared a lot about what they were talking about, except there were a few more guys and the age range was quite wide.

The older guys, instead of being around for 5 years, had been around for 50 years. While this is quite normal for the Knights of Columbus, after working in campus ministry for the past four years, it is nice to know that the leaders of today will be around tomorrow to help the next crop.

This is one of the steps of married life.

President-Elect Obama

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
CNN, Fox and the AP are calling it. Looks like the next Senator Obama should now be called President-Elect Obama.

Early Voting Ends Today

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
So go out and vote. I may regret saying this, since well, no one wants to hear anyone else's ranting, but I'll post some thoughts later today on my electoral thoughts.

Today over at Catholic Thinker, I'm blogging as part of Blog Action Day 2008. Why?

I was asked this question by a reporter for the Daily Texan newspaper, the daily student-run newspaper for The University of Texas at Austin.

I must admit, I was taken back by the question. Why wouldn't I do it? Blogging isn't my day job. I was blogging before it was known as blogging (I had a personal website long before folks called them "weblogs", much less "blogs"). If a group that has sizable traction wants everyone to try to write about one topic, in their own way, on a given day, let's do it.

The Internet allows for personal expression in personal ways. If you like to speak aloud, podcasting is for you. Love to see yourself talk, use YouTube. Want to just write, there are plenty of text-based blogging tools. Want to say it in under 140 characters, head over to Twitter.

My point is that the Internet allows you to say whatever you want in whatever medium you wish without having an editor to approve the topic, the length, the style or anything (although, the Internet would be a better place if every person had their own personal copy-editor, but I digress). If I can rant, as a "Catholic Thinker" about how the feast day of a 3rd-century pope is connected to the 2008 poverty topic, then that's exactly why. For me, the connection is obvious, but for others, not so much.

If you have a blog, take a few minutes and say a litle something about poverty.


This post is part of Blog Action Day 08 - Poverty

More poverty posts online

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
At midnight and a few minutes ago, another couple of posts from me as part of Blog Action Day 2008 are online at Catholic Thinker.

Blog Action Day Post

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
I'm posting a few entries over at Catholic Thinker for Blog Action Day. The first one (for 5:00 pm) is already online.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Monthly Archives

Powered by Movable Type 4.21-en