to mike who commented about fr. drinan, sj

My last post dealt with the Jesuit Georgetown University naming an endowed chair after a priest who has been a supporter of abortion. Mike left me a comment saying that I’ve been biased by anti-Drinan sources. I attempted to e-mail him on the address he left in the comment, but my e-mail was returned as undeliverable. Since I would like to be as accurate as possible, I’m reposting the e-mail here in hopes that Mike will see this and respond.
Hi Mike,
Can you refer me to some more materials from Fr. Drinan, SJ? From what I’ve been able to find, he seems a pretty clear supporter of abortion during both his political career and his time off of the Hill.
What I’ve found so far, from sources other than the Catholic News Agency, is that he supported President Clinton’s veto of the partial-birth abortion ban and pushed for an allowance of abortions anytime the doctor feel that the mother was at-risk.
If I misrepresented The Honorable Father, I’d like to be the first to issue a correction or clarification or whatever would be warranted.
As I am aware, he ran for office despite the Black Pope’s informing him that he could not and without the clear approval from the local bishop and while in office, he supported abortion, which unlike many actions, the Catholic Church has a firm and unchangeable opinion against. He did not seek re-election after a statement by Pope John Paul II that priests should not be elected officials.
Thank you for your comment and your assistance in finding more information about Fr. Drinan, SJ.
Take care,
Brandon Kraft

georgetown university is not catholic

Jesuit university endows human rights chair in name of pro-abortion priest
I do not believe that every Catholic university needs to follow the Ave Maria approach (that is, removing anything opposed or not fully inline with Catholic thought from anywhere near campus), but there is a duty to a Catholic university to be Catholic. At least, they should not celebrate confirmed evils.
Georgetown University, in Washington DC, named a human rights chair after Fr. Robert F. Drinan, SJ. Fr. Drinan, who also served in Congress after his ordination to the priesthood, is a fierce supporter of abortion.
Abortion is the taking of an innocent human life for the advancement of another person. Georgetown names an endowed chair after a person, much less a priest, who is completely in favor of abortion in the field of human rights? Does that make sense to anyone?
I wouldn’t be in favor of this still, but a chair of personal liberty or something to that effect would make more sense. Not only are they rejecting their Catholic basis, but are not following sound logic!

gaping hole is best for security

The bill authorizing the “celebrated” 700-mile fence along the 2,000-mile Mexico border has been signed into Federal law.
I’m glad that we feel a fence is a best way to take care of this problem and I’m glad that we feel like blocking 35% of the border is the right way to bulid a fence.
We have many problems in this country, but this isn’t the largest problem. This is a complex problem requiring complex solutions. Buliding a huge fence is nothing but a public relations stunt.
We’ll probably use “illegals” to build the fence.
Undocumented immigrants get a bad rap. Sure, perhaps they shouldn’t be in “our” country, but if we think that they are the cause of all that is evil in this country or that building a fence will make America stronger, we have some more thinking to do.

what would you think?

A short while ago, I found this e-mail in my inbox:

From: Richard Ribb Mailed-By: lists.cc.utexas.edu
To: la-students-s1@lists.cc.utexas.edu
Date: Oct 3, 2006 2:29 PM
Subject: OFFICIAL: graduation information
Dear Liberal Arts Seniors:
Congratulations on approaching the completion of your coursework at
UT Austin. If you are planning to graduate this December, you must
apply to graduate by 5:00 p.m, October 25. In most cases, you may
apply online from the College of Liberal Arts Web site at
.
Seniors who plan to graduate in May or August of 2007 must schedule
an official degree check with a Student Division advisor by October
24 or risk not graduating as expected. The Student Division advisors
confer with students in Gebauer 2.306. You may schedule an
appointment by calling 512-471-4271.
REGULAR SEMESTER-BY-SEMESTER MEETINGS WITH YOUR DEPARTMENTAL ACADEMIC
ADVISOR WILL FACILITATE SATISFACTORY PROGRESS TOWARD YOUR DEGREE, BUT
ARE NOT CONSIDERED OFFICIAL DEGREE CHECKS.
Sincerely,
Richard Flores
Associate Dean
College of Liberal Arts
www.utexas.edu/cola/
RF/rhr

From the e-mail, if you were planning on graduating in August 2007, what course of action should you take? I gathered that I should call and schedule a degree check.
After putting it off for about a week, I call today to schedule the degree check. The conversation went something like what follows:
Me: Hi, I’d like to schedule a degree check.
LA Employee: Sure, what semester do you graduate?
Me: August 2007
LA Employee: You don’t need to schedule a check until May.
Me: The e-mail I received said otherwise.
LA Employee: The system probably expects you to graduate in May. That’s why they sent you that e-mail. You can still schedule one if you like.
Me: No, I wouldn’t want to unless I had to, but for your knowledge, the e-mail says “Seniors who plan to graduate in May or August of 2007 must schedule an official degree check with a Student Division advisor by October 24″.
LA Employee: We might as well schedule one. What is your UTEID?
After that, she asked me if my major/minor was correct and I told her I wanted to declare a different minor. Since I need to redeclare online, she couldn’t schedule me anyhow and I’d have to call back in a week.
I e-mailed the associate dean who sent out the original e-mail since I’m not going to schedule a degree check unless it is required. I can already see what is going to happen. They’re going to be upset at the method I’m taking my Spanish courses. I’ll say yes, so I’m applying for a degree modification. They’ll grumble. Nothing exciting will happen.
That’s my UT issue of the day.

pictures of the DC trip online

I’ve posted pictures of the trip on my gallery page. I haven’t had the chance to go through all of them, so once the captions ended, I just uploaded everything. The good, the bad and the ugly. So, please ignore the bad photographs. I’ll go through when I have some spare time [insert laughter] and add captions and remove bad pictures.
I really like the Our Lady of Hope chapel. It is modern but still very well done.

Hosted by WPEngine.com